The Lakers are reportedly exploring options to add depth to their backcourt, and Jordan Clarkson’s name has surfaced as a possible trade target. Clarkson, known for his scoring ability and energy off the bench, could be a valuable addition to the Lakers’ roster as they seek more firepower and playmaking support for LeBron James and Anthony Davis. However, with Utah Jazz center Walker Kessler also in consideration, the Lakers must weigh whether the potential gain of Clarkson’s offense would be worth the cost of Kessler’s defensive s𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁 set. Here’s an analysis of what this move could mean for the Lakers:
1. Jordan Clarkson’s Offensive Spark and Versatility
Jordan Clarkson’s ability to create instant offense makes him one of the best sixth men in the NBA. Known for his aggressive scoring style and knack for hitting tough shots, Clarkson could provide the Lakers with much-needed bench scoring, helping to relieve some of the offensive load from LeBron and AD. Clarkson’s versatility as a scorer and playmaker would bring a new dynamic to the Lakers’ backcourt, especially in JJ Redick’s faster-paced, offense-focused gameplan.
2. What Walker Kessler Brings to the Table: Defense and Rim Protection
Walker Kessler, on the other hand, offers size, rebounding, and strong defensive instincts, which are areas where the Lakers could also use support. At 7’1” with a powerful shot-blocking ability, Kessler could complement AD and anchor the paint defensively. His presence would add much-needed size and allow Davis to play more flexibly, potentially reducing the wear and tear on his body over the season. Kessler’s fit with Redick’s focus on defensive discipline and positioning makes him an ideal big-man candidate for LA’s system.
3. Immediate Needs vs. Long-Term Development
A Clarkson trade would prioritize immediate offensive firepower over building a defensive foundation for the future. While Clarkson’s scoring could address current needs, Kessler represents a long-term asset with room to grow into an elite defensive anchor. For the Lakers, who have a championship window that largely depends on LeBron and AD’s remaining years at a high level, prioritizing the “win-now” approach with Clarkson might seem tempting. However, sacrificing Kessler could impact the Lakers’ defensive core in the long run, especially once LeBron moves toward retirement.
4. JJ Redick’s System: Finding the Right Fit
JJ Redick’s coaching style requires a balance of scoring and disciplined defense, with an emphasis on maintaining energy and commitment on both ends. Clarkson would be a valuable asset for Redick’s offensive schemes, giving the Lakers a reliable scoring option who can thrive in both isolation and catch-and-shoot scenarios. However, Kessler’s defensive s𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁s and ability to control the paint could be just as vital to the Lakers’ overall gameplan, providing a stronger defensive presence that could elevate their chances against high-scoring teams.
5. Financial Considerations and Trade Flexibility
Clarkson’s contract is manageable, but his market value is high, and the Jazz may demand a substantial return. Kessler, being on a rookie-scale contract, offers significant cost efficiency for the Lakers, who are likely cautious about adding too many high-salary players around LeBron and AD. Trading Kessler could reduce the Lakers’ long-term flexibility, especially if Clarkson doesn’t meet expectations or if the team needs additional assets for future moves.
6. Conclusion: Is the Clarkson Trade Worth the Cost of Kessler?
While Clarkson’s scoring would undoubtedly be a valuable addition to the Lakers, sacrificing Kessler might ultimately prove costly in terms of defensive stability and future potential. Kessler’s defensive presence and long-term upside make him a unique asset for a Lakers team that needs both short-term results and future depth. While Clarkson would provide the “instant offense” the Lakers are seeking, Kessler’s potential as a defensive cornerstone arguably brings more balance to the team and aligns with Redick’s focus on two-way play.
If the Lakers are confident in their current scoring potential and can address backcourt depth elsewhere, retaining Kessler may ultimately offer a more balanced path forward.
