J. Prince has publicly responded to Charleston White’s recent defense of his actions surrounding a past incident that led to a murder conviction. In a heated exchange that has sparked significant attention online, Prince criticized White’s approach to snitching, arguing that one cannot associate with criminals and then turn against them when faced with legal consequences.

The controversy stems from an incident that occurred when White was just 16 years old. He handed a gun to a friend who went on to shoot and 𝓀𝒾𝓁𝓁 an innocent man, Michael Levy. White later testified against his friend in court, a move that has led to accusations of him being a “rat” since he was a teenager. While White has tried to explain his actions by stating he was raised to tell the truth, many, including Prince, believe his involvement in the crime cannot be excused.

During a recent interview, Prince stated, “If you’re a good kid, you won’t be found around bad kids… handing over the gun and ordering your friend to shoot makes you complicit.” He emphasized that real men must take responsibility for their actions instead of attempting to justify or defend what he termed “evil actions.”

White’s defense includes his assertion that he was merely a 𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘥 influenced by his environment, claiming that his upbringing taught him to be honest, especially when questioned by authority figures. He contended that he was not a street kid but rather a rebellious youth caught up in a tragic situation.

As the debate continues, many are left questioning the moral implications of White’s past actions and whether his reasoning holds weight in the broader conversation about accountability and loyalty in the face of crime. The fallout from this situation has reignited discussions about snitching in hip-hop culture and the ethics surrounding such decisions. As both sides share their perspectives, the discourse around crime, loyalty, and truth in the community remains contentious and complex.